Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patrik Niklas-Salminen vs Marco Mendes Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Niklas-Salminen vs Mendes analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Patrik Niklas-Salminen vs Marco Mendes Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Niklas-Salminen 1 - 0 Mendes
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Niklas-Salminen has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mendes has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Niklas-Salminen, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mendes has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Niklas-Salminen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mendes has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Niklas-Salminen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mendes winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Niklas-Salminen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 48/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 43/ 40). Mendes has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Niklas-Salminen winning 1 times and Mendes being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Niklas-Salminen winning 2 and Mendes winning 0. The last match between Niklas-Salminen and Mendes was at the Israel F2 (Ramat Hasharon), 12-03-2018, Q2 round, Hard with Patrik Niklas-Salminen getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Niklas-Salminen and Mendes have played a deciding set 0 times, with Niklas-Salminen winning 0 times and Mendes 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Niklas-Salminen winning 0, and Mendes 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Niklas-Salminen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mendes has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Niklas-Salminen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mendes has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Niklas-Salminen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mendes has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
881
Rank
418
High
27
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
45
Age
Plays
Form
53% (164-147)
Career Total W/L
29% (2-5)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Patrik Niklas-Salminen vs Marco Mendes For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Niklas-Salminen VS Mendes
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Niklas-Salminen VS Mendes H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Patrik Niklas-Salminen | Marco Mendes |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Niklas-Salminen VS Mendes H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patrik Niklas-Salminen | Marco Mendes |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Patrik Niklas-Salminen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Valentin Royer
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
73%
(
69 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
78 of
104)
10
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
65 of
78)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
22 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
29 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karol Drzewiecki
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksi Lofman
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Peetu Pohjola
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Oskari Eerola
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Billy Blaydes
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Marco Mendes Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Q | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Niklas-Salminen Vs Mendes Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Niklas-Salminen are available here and Mendes photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
